From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit c25bf185e57213b54ea0d632ac04907310993433 ] This can only happen if there's a bug somewhere, so let's make it a WARN not a printk. Also, I think it's safest to ignore the corruption rather than trying to fix it by removing a cache entry. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c index 0c10bfea039e..4a258065188e 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c @@ -469,8 +469,7 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) rtn = RC_REPLY; break; default: - printk(KERN_WARNING "nfsd: bad repcache type %d\n", rp->c_type); - nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(b, rp, nn); + WARN_ONCE(1, "nfsd: bad repcache type %d\n", rp->c_type); } goto out; -- 2.25.1
