On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:26:37PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Let's rephrase it: you think therefore that completion should be > > initialzed *after* requesting shared interrupts? You think that exactly > > that order shall be used in the source code? > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > > > I think that completion should be initialized before it is used, just > like any other variable. So far you have not proven any code path > through which it can be used uninitialized, therefore I don't see why > this should be accepted as a bug fix. Cleanup, cosmetic refactoring, > design patterns, whatever, sure. Sure, let it call then cleanup, cosmetic refactoring. Best regards, Krzysztof
