On 6/1/20 8:30 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 12:22:54PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:58:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 09:58:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> > Upstream commit 106d45f350c7 ("scsi: zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing wrong traces")
>>> > upstream: v5.3-rc1
>>> > Fixes: d27a7cb91960 ("zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port")
>>> > in linux-4.4.y: b5752b0db014
>>> > upstream: v4.9-rc1
>>> > Affected branches:
>>> > linux-4.4.y
>>> > linux-4.9.y
>>> > linux-4.14.y
>>> > linux-4.19.y (already applied)
>>>
>>> This patch does not apply on those older branches, do you have a working
>>> backport?
>>
>> I am a bit at loss. Right now my script still tells me:
>>
>> Upstream commit 106d45f350c7 ("scsi: zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing wrong traces")
>> upstream: v5.3-rc1
>> Fixes: d27a7cb91960 ("zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port")
>> in linux-4.4.y: b5752b0db014
>> upstream: v4.9-rc1
>> Affected branches:
>> linux-4.4.y
>> linux-4.9.y
>> linux-4.14.y
>> linux-4.19.y (already applied)
>>
>> It only does that if the patch cherry-picks cleanly; otherwise it would
>> report conflicts. I checked and made sure that the patch was indeed applied
>> to my test branches for linux-{4.4,4.9,4.14}.y. I re-applied it, just to be
>> sure, with no problems. I also extracted it with git format-patch and
>> applied it with "git am", without issue.
>
> Same here, so I've queued it up.
>
>> What do you use to apply patches ?
>
> *snicker*
>
> https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ab/8f/f8/ab8ff8a51f1c2a9014cd9cc71c6def0a.png
>
>> Anyway, my script also tells me:
>>
>> Upstream commit a33a5d2d16cb ("genirq/generic_pending: Do not lose pending affinity update")
>> upstream: v4.18-rc1
>> Fixes: 98229aa36caa ("x86/irq: Plug vector cleanup race")
>> in linux-4.4.y: 996c591227d9
>> upstream: v4.5-rc2
>> Affected branches:
>> linux-4.4.y (queued)
>> linux-4.9.y (queued)
>> linux-4.14.y
>>
>> and, indeed, it looks like a33a5d2d16cb is missing in v4.14.y-queue.
>
> I think that Greg's script didn't like a33a5d2d16cb pointing to the
> wrong "fixes:" commit - 996c591227d9 rather than 98229aa36caa.
>
Interesting. Makes me wonder how my script found the correct reference.
But then why did his script pick it up for 4.4.y and 4.9.y ?
Guenter
