From: Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0cada33241d9de205522e3858b18e506ca5cce2c ]
tls_sw_recvmsg() and tls_decrypt_done() can be run concurrently.
// tls_sw_recvmsg()
if (atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending))
crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
else
reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
//tls_decrypt_done()
pending = atomic_dec_return(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
if (!pending && READ_ONCE(ctx->async_notify))
complete(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
Consider the scenario tls_decrypt_done() is about to run complete()
if (!pending && READ_ONCE(ctx->async_notify))
and tls_sw_recvmsg() reads decrypt_pending == 0, does reinit_completion(),
then tls_decrypt_done() runs complete(). This sequence of execution
results in wrong completion. Consequently, for next decrypt request,
it will not wait for completion, eventually on connection close, crypto
resources freed, there is no way to handle pending decrypt response.
This race condition can be avoided by having atomic_read() mutually
exclusive with atomic_dec_return(),complete().Intoduced spin lock to
ensure the mutual exclution.
Addressed similar problem in tx direction.
v1->v2:
- More readable commit message.
- Corrected the lock to fix new race scenario.
- Removed barrier which is not needed now.
Fixes: a42055e8d2c3 ("net/tls: Add support for async encryption of records for performance")
Signed-off-by: Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/tls.h | 4 ++++
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/include/net/tls.h
+++ b/include/net/tls.h
@@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ struct tls_sw_context_tx {
struct tls_rec *open_rec;
struct list_head tx_list;
atomic_t encrypt_pending;
+ /* protect crypto_wait with encrypt_pending */
+ spinlock_t encrypt_compl_lock;
int async_notify;
int async_capable;
@@ -177,6 +179,8 @@ struct tls_sw_context_rx {
int async_capable;
bool decrypted;
atomic_t decrypt_pending;
+ /* protect crypto_wait with decrypt_pending*/
+ spinlock_t decrypt_compl_lock;
bool async_notify;
};
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -203,10 +203,12 @@ static void tls_decrypt_done(struct cryp
kfree(aead_req);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
pending = atomic_dec_return(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
- if (!pending && READ_ONCE(ctx->async_notify))
+ if (!pending && ctx->async_notify)
complete(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
}
static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
@@ -464,10 +466,12 @@ static void tls_encrypt_done(struct cryp
ready = true;
}
+ spin_lock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
pending = atomic_dec_return(&ctx->encrypt_pending);
- if (!pending && READ_ONCE(ctx->async_notify))
+ if (!pending && ctx->async_notify)
complete(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
if (!ready)
return;
@@ -923,6 +927,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, stru
int num_zc = 0;
int orig_size;
int ret = 0;
+ int pending;
if (msg->msg_flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -1089,13 +1094,19 @@ trim_sgl:
goto send_end;
} else if (num_zc) {
/* Wait for pending encryptions to get completed */
- smp_store_mb(ctx->async_notify, true);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
+ ctx->async_notify = true;
- if (atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending))
+ pending = atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
+ if (pending)
crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
else
reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
+ /* There can be no concurrent accesses, since we have no
+ * pending encrypt operations
+ */
WRITE_ONCE(ctx->async_notify, false);
if (ctx->async_wait.err) {
@@ -1724,6 +1735,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
bool is_kvec = iov_iter_is_kvec(&msg->msg_iter);
bool is_peek = flags & MSG_PEEK;
int num_async = 0;
+ int pending;
flags |= nonblock;
@@ -1886,8 +1898,11 @@ pick_next_record:
recv_end:
if (num_async) {
/* Wait for all previously submitted records to be decrypted */
- smp_store_mb(ctx->async_notify, true);
- if (atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending)) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
+ ctx->async_notify = true;
+ pending = atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
+ if (pending) {
err = crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
if (err) {
/* one of async decrypt failed */
@@ -1899,6 +1914,10 @@ recv_end:
} else {
reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
}
+
+ /* There can be no concurrent accesses, since we have no
+ * pending decrypt operations
+ */
WRITE_ONCE(ctx->async_notify, false);
/* Drain records from the rx_list & copy if required */
@@ -2285,6 +2304,7 @@ int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk,
if (tx) {
crypto_init_wait(&sw_ctx_tx->async_wait);
+ spin_lock_init(&sw_ctx_tx->encrypt_compl_lock);
crypto_info = &ctx->crypto_send.info;
cctx = &ctx->tx;
aead = &sw_ctx_tx->aead_send;
@@ -2293,6 +2313,7 @@ int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk,
sw_ctx_tx->tx_work.sk = sk;
} else {
crypto_init_wait(&sw_ctx_rx->async_wait);
+ spin_lock_init(&sw_ctx_rx->decrypt_compl_lock);
crypto_info = &ctx->crypto_recv.info;
cctx = &ctx->rx;
skb_queue_head_init(&sw_ctx_rx->rx_list);
