Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/81] 4.19.125-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:02:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:52:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.125 release.
> > There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 28 May 2020 18:36:22 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> Build results:
> 	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 421 pass: 390 fail: 31
> Failed tests:
> 	<all alpha>
> 	<all sh>
> 	<all sheb>
> 
> Bisect log (for alpha) below. Reverting the offending patch fixes the
> problem. Note that the problematic patch is associated with several
> other patches in the upstream kernel. Not all of them have a Fixes: tag,
> and I am not sure if all of them reference the problematic patch.

ah, I was worried about that patch.  ugh.  Ok, I'll drop it and make the
submitter send all of the fixups as well.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux