Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 07:27:09PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Le lundi 25 mai 2020 à 16:42:49 (+0200), gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

This patch needs  commit
   b34cb07dde7c ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more")
to be applied first. But then, it will not apply. The backport is :

[ Upstream commit 39f23ce07b9355d05a64ae303ce20d1c4b92b957 upstream ]

Although not exactly identical, unthrottle_cfs_rq() and enqueue_task_fair()
are quite close and follow the same sequence for enqueuing an entity in the
cfs hierarchy. Modify unthrottle_cfs_rq() to use the same pattern as
enqueue_task_fair(). This fixes a problem already faced with the latter and
add an optimization in the last for_each_sched_entity loop.

Fixes: fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning)
Reported-by Tao Zhou <zohooouoto@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200513135528.4742-1-vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx

Peter, could you review/ack the backport please? It's very different
from the upstream version.

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux