Hi,
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:49:15AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.13, v5.4.41, v4.19.123, v4.14.180, v4.9.223, v4.4.223.
>
> v5.6.13: Build OK!
> v5.4.41: Build OK!
> v4.19.123: Build OK!
>
> v4.14.180: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> e26dead44268 ("ARM: dts: imx6q-bx50v3: Add internal switch")
>
> v4.9.223: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 1d0c7bb20c08 ("ARM: dts: imx: Correct B850v3 clock assignment")
> e26dead44268 ("ARM: dts: imx6q-bx50v3: Add internal switch")
>
> v4.4.223: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 15ef03b86247 ("ARM: dts: imx: b450/b650v3: Move ldb_di clk assignment")
> 1d0c7bb20c08 ("ARM: dts: imx: Correct B850v3 clock assignment")
> 2252792b4677 ("ARM: dts: imx: Add support for Advantech/GE B850v3")
> 226d16c80c61 ("ARM: dts: imx: Add support for Advantech/GE Bx50v3")
> 547da6bbcf08 ("ARM: dts: imx: Add support for Advantech/GE B450v3")
> 987e71877ae6 ("ARM: dts: imx: Add support for Advantech/GE B650v3")
> b492b8744da9 ("ARM: dts: imx6q-b850v3: Update display clock source")
> e26dead44268 ("ARM: dts: imx6q-bx50v3: Add internal switch")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
Applying it to v4.4 does not make sense (impacted devices are not
supported on that version) and it should be fine to ignore it for
v4.9 and v4.14. The impact is broken dual display setup. I tested
the patch on 4.19 stable tree and I think it makes sense to apply
it to 4.19 and newer.
-- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
