On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:58:52AM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote: > Hi Marcelo, > > I'm marking this as superseded by pwid 303977 > > http://patchwork.lab.bos.redhat.com/patch/303977/ > > which was included in kernel-4.18.0-196.el8 > > commit 9751522d92195bc64883c71e2bee8ed0fcbc5007 > Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon Apr 20 15:20:04 2020 -0400 > > [x86] kvm: x86: use raw clock values consistently > > Message-id: <20200420152004.933168-1-vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> > Patchwork-id: 303977 > Patchwork-instance: patchwork > O-Subject: [RHEL8.3 virt PATCH v2 312/614] KVM: x86: use raw clock values consistently > Bugzilla: 1813987 > RH-Acked-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > RH-Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > RH-Acked-by: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Note there is a difference between yours and Vitaly's patch in the > following hunk > > +@@ -1656,6 +1656,18 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk) > > write_seqcount_end(&vdata->seq); > } > @@ -14,12 +16,12 @@ > +static s64 get_kvmclock_base_ns(void) > +{ > + /* Master clock not used, so we can just use CLOCK_BOOTTIME. */ > -+ return ktime_get_boottime_ns(); > ++ return ktime_get_boot_ns(); > +} > #endif > > > This is in !CONFIG_X86_64 path, so I'm not sure how much we care about > this. Anyway Vitaly's patch corrects this, because > rhel does not have upstream commit 9285ec4c8b61d4930a575081abeba2cd4f449a74 Gotta love private git repo discussions on a public mailing list :) greg k-h
