On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:55 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On 5/14/20 3:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:14:20AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:26:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:58:35PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks test bot catch the issue.
> > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 03:44:18PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > > Greeting,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > commit: 77bb53cb094828a31cd3c5b402899810f63073c1 ("selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on systems w/ offline CPUs")
> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The author for this commit is Andrii(cc'd).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mine is f1c3656c6d9c ("selftests/bpf: Skip perf hw events test if the setup disabled it")
> > > > > > > prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c:55:3: error: label ‘cleanup’ used but not defined
> > > > > > > goto cleanup;
> > > > > > > ^~~~
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Greg, we are missing a depend commit
> > > > > > dde53c1b763b ("selftests/bpf: Convert few more selftest to skeletons").
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So either we need backport this patch, or if you like, we can also fix it by
> > > > > > changing 'goto cleanup;' to 'goto close_prog;'. So which one do you prefer?
> >
> > Hi, sorry for late reply, missed emails earlier.
> >
> > The above "selftest to skeletons" commit will need some more after that,
> > it's going to be a pretty big back-port, so I think just fixing it up would
> > be ok.
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know, I have no context here at all, sorry.
> > > > >
> > > > > What stable kernel tree is failing, what patch needs to be changed, what
> > > > > patch caused this, and so on...
> > > > >
> > > > > confused,
> > > >
> > > > Oh, sorry, I should reply the full email. I will forward the full message in
> > > > the bellow. For your questions:
> > > >
> > > > the stable kernel tree is linux-5.4.y,
> > > > my patch is da43712a7262 ("selftests/bpf: Skip perf hw events test if the
> > > > setup disabled it")[1].
> > > >
> > > > The reason is we are lacking upstream commit
> > > > dde53c1b763b ("selftests/bpf: Convert few more selftest to skeletons").
> > > >
> > > > This will call build warning
> > > > prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c:55:3: error: label ‘cleanup’ used but not defined
> > > > goto cleanup;
> > > > ^~~~
> > > >
> > > > To fix it, I think the easiest way is change the "goto cleanup" to "goto
> > > > close_prog".
> > >
> > > Ok, can you send a patch for this, documenting all of the above so I
> > > know what's going on?
> > >
> > > > For the other error:
> > > >
> > > > prog_tests/perf_buffer.c: In function ‘test_perf_buffer’:
> > > > prog_tests/perf_buffer.c:39:8: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘parse_cpu_mask_file’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > > > err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online",
> > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > ../lib.mk:138: recipe for target '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-kselftests-da43712a7262891317883d4b3a909fb18dac4b1d/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs' failed
> > > > make: *** [/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-kselftests-da43712a7262891317883d4b3a909fb18dac4b1d/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs] Error 1
> > > > make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-kselftests-da43712a7262891317883d4b3a909fb18dac4b1d/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
> > > >
> > > > I think Andrii may like help.
> > >
> > > That looks like a bug, we should revert the offending patch, right?
> >
> > 6803ee25f0ea ("libbpf: Extract and generalize CPU mask parsing logic") added
> > parse_cpu_mask_file() function, so back-porting that commit should solve
> > this? It should be straightforward and shouldn't bring any more dependent
> > commits.
>
> As this does not apply cleanly, can you provide a working backport so
> that I can apply that?
Sure, will do.
>
> tahnks,
>
> greg k-h
