On May 7, 2020 4:34:22 AM PDT, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:07:24AM -0700, hpa@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> On May 5, 2020 10:44:22 AM PDT, Nick Desaulniers ><ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ arch_set_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long >*addr) >> > if (__builtin_constant_p(nr)) { >> > asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0" >> > : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr) >> >- : "iq" (CONST_MASK(nr) & 0xff) >> >+ : "iq" ((u8)(CONST_MASK(nr) & 0xff)) >> > : "memory"); >> > } else { >> > asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX __ASM_SIZE(bts) " %1,%0" >> >@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ arch_clear_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long >*addr) >> > if (__builtin_constant_p(nr)) { >> > asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0" >> > : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr) >> >- : "iq" (CONST_MASK(nr) ^ 0xff)); >> >+ : "iq" ((u8)(CONST_MASK(nr) ^ 0xff))); >> > } else { >> > asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX __ASM_SIZE(btr) " %1,%0" >> > : : RLONG_ADDR(addr), "Ir" (nr) : "memory"); >> >> Drop & 0xff and change ^ 0xff to ~. > >But then we're back to sparse being unhappy, no? The thing with ~ is >that it will set high bits which will be truncated, which makes sparse >sad. In that case, sparse is just broken. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.