On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 14:38, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 23:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.8 release. > > There are 167 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:20:42 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.8-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > NOTE: > This kernel panic seems to be platform specific. > However, I am sharing a few kernel panic logs here. > While running LTP cve[1] and libhugetlbfs[2] test suite on nxp ls2088 > device the kernel panic noticed with different kernel dump > and unfortunately it is not easily reproducible. > At this point it is unclear whether this problem > started happening from this stable rc review or not. > Because a different type of kernel panic noticed on Linus 's mainline tree > (5.7.0-rc2) version kernel while running LTP containers tests. As per the initial investigation these kernel panic (s) noticed from a single machine out of five machines under test. - Naresh
