3.5.7.32 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> commit c091c71ad2218fc50a07b3d1dab85783f3b77efd upstream. GFP_ATOMIC is not a single gfp flag, but a macro which expands to the other flags, where meaningful is the LACK of __GFP_WAIT flag. To check if caller wants to perform an atomic allocation, the code must test for a lack of the __GFP_WAIT flag. This patch fixes the issue introduced in v3.5-rc1. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c index c0f420f..4baa8ff 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ void *dma_generic_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, flag |= __GFP_ZERO; again: page = NULL; - if (!(flag & GFP_ATOMIC)) + /* CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping */ + if (flag & __GFP_WAIT) page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, get_order(size)); + /* fallback */ if (!page) page = alloc_pages_node(dev_to_node(dev), flag, get_order(size)); if (!page) -- 1.9.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html