3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
commit e2683fc9d219430f5b78889b50cde7f40efeba7b upstream.
I've noticed that the updated item checker stack consumption increased
dramatically in 542f5385e20cf97447 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add checker
for dir item")
tree-checker.c:check_leaf +552 (176 -> 728)
The array is 255 bytes long, dynamic allocation would slow down the
sanity checks so it's more reasonable to keep it on-stack. Moving the
variable to the scope of use reduces the stack usage again
tree-checker.c:check_leaf -264 (728 -> 464)
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ static int check_dir_item(struct btrfs_r
di = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
while (cur < item_size) {
- char namebuf[max(BTRFS_NAME_LEN, XATTR_NAME_MAX)];
u32 name_len;
u32 data_len;
u32 max_name_len;
@@ -295,6 +294,8 @@ static int check_dir_item(struct btrfs_r
*/
if (key->type == BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY ||
key->type == BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY) {
+ char namebuf[max(BTRFS_NAME_LEN, XATTR_NAME_MAX)];
+
read_extent_buffer(leaf, namebuf,
(unsigned long)(di + 1), name_len);
name_hash = btrfs_name_hash(namebuf, name_len);
