3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit f394722fb0d0f701119368959d7cd0ecbc46363a upstream.
neigh_cleanup() has not been used for seven years, and was a wrong design.
Messing with shared pointer in bond_neigh_init() without proper
memory barriers would at least trigger syzbot complains eventually.
It is time to remove this stuff.
Fixes: b63b70d87741 ("IPoIB: Use a private hash table for path lookup in xmit path")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3431,19 +3431,10 @@ static int bond_neigh_init(struct neighb
return 0;
parms.neigh_setup = NULL;
- parms.neigh_cleanup = NULL;
ret = slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup(slave->dev, &parms);
if (ret)
return ret;
- /*
- * Assign slave's neigh_cleanup to neighbour in case cleanup is called
- * after the last slave has been detached. Assumes that all slaves
- * utilize the same neigh_cleanup (true at this writing as only user
- * is ipoib).
- */
- n->parms->neigh_cleanup = parms.neigh_cleanup;
-
if (!parms.neigh_setup)
return 0;
--- a/include/net/neighbour.h
+++ b/include/net/neighbour.h
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ struct neigh_parms {
struct net_device *dev;
struct neigh_parms *next;
int (*neigh_setup)(struct neighbour *);
- void (*neigh_cleanup)(struct neighbour *);
struct neigh_table *tbl;
void *sysctl_table;
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -103,9 +103,6 @@ static int neigh_blackhole(struct neighb
static void neigh_cleanup_and_release(struct neighbour *neigh)
{
- if (neigh->parms->neigh_cleanup)
- neigh->parms->neigh_cleanup(neigh);
-
__neigh_notify(neigh, RTM_DELNEIGH, 0);
neigh_release(neigh);
}
