From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 682756827501dc52593bf490f2d437c65ec9efcb ]
Even though online resize is successfully done, a SPO immediately
after resize, still causes below error in the next mount.
[ 11.294650] F2FS-fs (sda8): Wrong user_block_count: 2233856
[ 11.300272] F2FS-fs (sda8): Failed to get valid F2FS checkpoint
This is because after FS metadata is updated in update_fs_metadata()
if the SBI_IS_DIRTY is not dirty, then CP will not be done to reflect
the new user_block_count.
Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index 5877bd7296896..e611d768efde3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -1532,11 +1532,17 @@ int f2fs_resize_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, __u64 block_count)
goto out;
}
+ mutex_lock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
update_fs_metadata(sbi, -secs);
clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_RESIZEFS);
+ set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
+ mutex_unlock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
+
err = f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
if (err) {
+ mutex_lock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
update_fs_metadata(sbi, secs);
+ mutex_unlock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
update_sb_metadata(sbi, secs);
f2fs_commit_super(sbi, false);
}
--
2.20.1
