From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
commit d0802dc411f469569a537283b6f3833af47aece9 upstream.
Commit f949a12fd697 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing
set_rxnfc") tried to fix the some user controlled buffer overflows in
bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set() and bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del() but the fix was using
CFP_NUM_RULES, which while it is correct not to overflow the bitmaps, is
not representative of what the device actually supports. Correct that by
using bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size() instead.
The latter subtracts the number of rules by 1, so change the checks from
greater than or equal to greater than accordingly.
Fixes: f949a12fd697 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing set_rxnfc")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
@@ -882,17 +882,14 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set(struct d
fs->m_ext.data[1]))
return -EINVAL;
- if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY && fs->location >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+ if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
+ fs->location > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
return -EINVAL;
if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
test_bit(fs->location, priv->cfp.used))
return -EBUSY;
- if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
- fs->location > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
- return -EINVAL;
-
ret = bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_cmp(priv, port, fs);
if (ret == 0)
return -EEXIST;
@@ -973,7 +970,7 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del(struct b
struct cfp_rule *rule;
int ret;
- if (loc >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+ if (loc > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
return -EINVAL;
/* Refuse deleting unused rules, and those that are not unique since
