Hi,
On 4/16/20 6:07 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Call disable_interrupts() if we have to revert to polling in order not to
unnecessarily reserve the IRQ for the life-cycle of the driver.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.5.x
Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e3837e74a06d ("tpm_tis: Refactor the interrupt setup")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I can confirm that this fixes the "irq 31 nobody cared" oops for me:
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 27c6ca031e23..2435216bd10a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -433,6 +433,9 @@ static void disable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
u32 intmask;
int rc;
+ if (priv->irq == 0)
+ return;
+
rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality), &intmask);
if (rc < 0)
intmask = 0;
@@ -1062,9 +1065,12 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
if (irq) {
tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(chip, intmask, IRQF_SHARED,
irq);
- if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ))
+ if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ)) {
dev_err(&chip->dev, FW_BUG
"TPM interrupt not working, polling instead\n");
+
+ disable_interrupts(chip);
+ }
} else {
tpm_tis_probe_irq(chip, intmask);
}
