From: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 7482d9cb5b974b7ad1a58fa8714f7a8c05b5d278 ]
Cited patch missed to extract PCI pf number accurately for PF and VF
port flavour. It considered PCI device + function number.
Due to this, device having non zero device number shown large pfnum.
Hence, use only PCI function number; to avoid similar errors, derive
pfnum one time for all port flavours.
Fixes: f60f315d339e ("net/mlx5e: Register devlink ports for physical link, PCI PF, VFs")
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
@@ -1854,29 +1854,30 @@ static int register_devlink_port(struct
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep = rpriv->rep;
struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid = {};
unsigned int dl_port_index = 0;
+ u16 pfnum;
if (!is_devlink_port_supported(dev, rpriv))
return 0;
mlx5e_rep_get_port_parent_id(rpriv->netdev, &ppid);
+ pfnum = PCI_FUNC(dev->pdev->devfn);
if (rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK) {
devlink_port_attrs_set(&rpriv->dl_port,
DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL,
- PCI_FUNC(dev->pdev->devfn), false, 0,
+ pfnum, false, 0,
&ppid.id[0], ppid.id_len);
dl_port_index = vport_to_devlink_port_index(dev, rep->vport);
} else if (rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_PF) {
devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set(&rpriv->dl_port,
&ppid.id[0], ppid.id_len,
- dev->pdev->devfn);
+ pfnum);
dl_port_index = rep->vport;
} else if (mlx5_eswitch_is_vf_vport(dev->priv.eswitch,
rpriv->rep->vport)) {
devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set(&rpriv->dl_port,
&ppid.id[0], ppid.id_len,
- dev->pdev->devfn,
- rep->vport - 1);
+ pfnum, rep->vport - 1);
dl_port_index = vport_to_devlink_port_index(dev, rep->vport);
}
