This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following patch were queued: Subject: media: ov5640: fix use of destroyed mutex Author: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> Date: Wed Mar 25 13:20:00 2020 +0100 v4l2_ctrl_handler_free() uses hdl->lock, which in ov5640 driver is set to sensor's own sensor->lock. In ov5640_remove(), the driver destroys the sensor->lock first, and then calls v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(), resulting in the use of the destroyed mutex. Fix this by calling moving the mutex_destroy() to the end of the cleanup sequence, as there's no need to destroy the mutex as early as possible. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.14+ Reviewed-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c index 854031f0b64a..2fe4a7ac0592 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c @@ -3093,8 +3093,8 @@ static int ov5640_probe(struct i2c_client *client) free_ctrls: v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler); entity_cleanup: - mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity); + mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); return ret; } @@ -3104,9 +3104,9 @@ static int ov5640_remove(struct i2c_client *client) struct ov5640_dev *sensor = to_ov5640_dev(sd); v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&sensor->sd); - mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity); v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler); + mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); return 0; }
