Re: [stable request 3.6~3.10] two ARM spinlock fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:59:03PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Please queue the following two fixes for 3.10.
> 
> 15e7e5c1ebf556cd620c9b091e121091ac760f6d
> ("ARM: 7749/1: spinlock: retry trylock operation if strex fails on free lock")
> 
> 00efaa0250939dc148e2d3104fb3c18395d24a2d 
> ("ARM: 7812/1: rwlocks: retry trylock operation if strex fails on free lock")
> 
> 
> We found spin_trylock() occasionally fails without lock contention on 3.10.x
> when running a simple test.
> 
>         for (i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
>                 if (!spin_trylock(&testlock)) {
>                         printk("Get lock failed: %d!\n", i);
>                         continue;
>                 }
>                 spin_unlock(&testlock);
>         }
> 
> and the bug can be fixed by these two commits.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]