From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit fbe4e0c1b298b4665ee6915266c9d6c5b934ef4a ]
fib_triestat_seq_show() calls hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(tb, head,
tb_hlist) without rcu_read_lock() will trigger a warning,
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:2579 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by proc01/115277:
#0: c0000014507acf00 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read+0x58/0x670
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xf4/0x164 (unreliable)
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x140/0x164
fib_triestat_seq_show+0x750/0x880
seq_read+0x1a0/0x670
proc_reg_read+0x10c/0x1b0
__vfs_read+0x3c/0x70
vfs_read+0xac/0x170
ksys_read+0x7c/0x140
system_call+0x5c/0x68
Fix it by adding a pair of rcu_read_lock/unlock() and use
cond_resched_rcu() to avoid the situation where walking of a large
number of items may prevent scheduling for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -2319,6 +2319,7 @@ static int fib_triestat_seq_show(struct
" %zd bytes, size of tnode: %zd bytes.\n",
LEAF_SIZE, TNODE_SIZE(0));
+ rcu_read_lock();
for (h = 0; h < FIB_TABLE_HASHSZ; h++) {
struct hlist_head *head = &net->ipv4.fib_table_hash[h];
struct fib_table *tb;
@@ -2338,7 +2339,9 @@ static int fib_triestat_seq_show(struct
trie_show_usage(seq, t->stats);
#endif
}
+ cond_resched_rcu();
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
