Re: [PATCH 0/4] backport request for use-after-free blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] backport request for use-after-free blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:04:37 +0200
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200407165539.161505-1-gprocida@google.com>

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:55:35PM +0100, Giuliano Procida wrote:
> Here are the patches for linux-4.4.y. Untested.

Can you fix up patch 1/4 as noted, and test them before resending them?

thanks,

greg k-h

References:
- Re: backport request for use-after-free blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
  - From: Giuliano Procida
- [PATCH 0/4] backport request for use-after-free blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
  - From: Giuliano Procida

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: more locking around delayed work
Next by Date: Re: Missing patches related to ARM_ERRATA_814220 in linux-5.4.y branch
Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/4] backport request for use-after-free blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/4] block: more locking around delayed work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux