On 19.02.2014 00:17, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:05:01PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> Hi >> >> Here are 5 patches (version 2) for 3.10-stable. They are in response to: >> >> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ltsi-dev/2014-February/003094.html > > You add a bunch of patches that are not stable kernel material at all. > As-is, I can't take this, sorry. If all of these patches are required, > how is this really a needed patch for 3.10? > > confused, Sorry. In fact all I want is 1 patch added to LTSI-3.10 as sent here: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ltsi-dev/2014-February/003092.html You asked for it to go through 3.10-stable: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ltsi-dev/2014-February/003094.html But it is dependent on patches that are in LTSI-3.10 (for Bay Trail) but not 3.10-stable. Would it be OK to add just the 1 patch (in the first link above) to LTSI-3.10? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html