On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:45:09PM +0200, Dirk Müller wrote: > Hi Greg, > > >> $ sed -i 's;scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.l;scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c_shipped;g' \ > >> queue-{4.4,4.9,4.14}/scripts-dtc-remove-redundant-yyloc-global-declaration.patch > >> If you would prefer a set of patches, let me know. > > Should I just drop the patch from 4.4, 4.9, and 4.14 instead? > > as the original author of the patch, I am not sure why it was backported to the LTS releases (unless enablement for gcc 10.x or > other new toolchains is a requirement, which I'm not aware of). Keeping the older kernels building with newer compilers is something that we do. It's needed as our build systems "age-out" the older compilers a lot :) > However I think the sed above on the *patch* means that the patch will *only* modify the generated sources, not the input sources. I think > it would be better to patch both *input* and *generated* sources, or backport the generate-at-runtime patch as well (which might be > even further outside the stable policy). What do you mean by "input sources" here? > Not knowing why it was backported, I would suggest to just dequeue the patch from the older trees. If I drop it for now, I'll have to add it back when gcc10 is pushed out to my build systems and laptops :( thanks, greg k-h