From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 18d200460cd73636d4f20674085c39e32b4e0097 ] The busy timeout for the CMD5 to put the eMMC into sleep state, is specific to the card. Potentially the timeout may exceed the host->max_busy_timeout. If that becomes the case, mmc_sleep() converts from using an R1B response to an R1 response, as to prevent the host from doing HW busy detection. However, it has turned out that some hosts requires an R1B response no matter what, so let's respect that via checking MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY. Note that, if the R1B gets enforced, the host becomes fully responsible of managing the needed busy timeout, in one way or the other. Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200311092036.16084-1-ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index f6912ded652dc..de14b5845f525 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -1910,9 +1910,12 @@ static int mmc_sleep(struct mmc_host *host) * If the max_busy_timeout of the host is specified, validate it against * the sleep cmd timeout. A failure means we need to prevent the host * from doing hw busy detection, which is done by converting to a R1 - * response instead of a R1B. + * response instead of a R1B. Note, some hosts requires R1B, which also + * means they are on their own when it comes to deal with the busy + * timeout. */ - if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) { + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) && host->max_busy_timeout && + (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) { cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC; } else { cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC; -- 2.20.1
