On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:11:46PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Greg at al, > > Please the following commit: > > commit 024aa8732acb7d2503eae43c3fe3504d0a8646d0 > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Nov 28 23:50:40 2019 +0100 > > ACPI: PM: s2idle: Rework ACPI events synchronization > > Note that the EC GPE processing need not be synchronized in > acpi_s2idle_wake() after invoking acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(), because > that function checks the GPE status and dispatches its handler if > need be and the SCI action handler is not going to run anyway at > that point. > > Moreover, it is better to drain all of the pending ACPI events > before restoring the working-state configuration of GPEs in > acpi_s2idle_restore(), because those events are likely to be related > to system wakeup, in which case they will not be relevant going > forward. > > Rework the code to take these observations into account. > > Tested-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > > into 5.4.y as it is needed to fix an ACPI wakeup events > synchronization issue in suspend-to-idle. > > Note that this commit was present in 5.5.0, so 5.4.y is the only > -stable series needing this fix. Now queued up, thanks! greg k-h
