On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:12:15AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > + Naresh > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 20:25, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:31:18PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > >The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree. > > >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > >id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > >thanks, > > > > > >greg k-h > > > > > >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > > >From 1292e3efb149ee21d8d33d725eeed4e6b1ade963 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > >From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:49:43 +0100 > > >Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for CMD6 > > > > > >It has turned out that some host controllers can't use R1B for CMD6 and > > >other commands that have R1B associated with them. Therefore invent a new > > >host cap, MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY to let them specify this. > > > > > >In __mmc_switch(), let's check the flag and use it to prevent R1B responses > > >from being converted into R1. Note that, this also means that the host are > > >on its own, when it comes to manage the busy timeout. > > > > > >Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >Tested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >Tested-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> > > >Tested-By: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx> > > >Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I've fixed up and queued this whole mmc series of stable tagged patches > > for 4.19-5.5. > > I looked at stable-rc tree and realized that you have also picked the > following patch: > > commit 533a6cfe08f96a7b5c65e06d20916d552c11b256 > Author: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Jan 22 15:27:47 2020 +0100 > mmc: core: Default to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch() > > I assume this one was needed to apply the others mmc patches on top. > This is a problem, because the above patch should not go for stable as > it causes problems (unless additional patches are backported as well). > > I suggest to drop the whole slew of mmc patches for the current stable > rcs. Then I can send manual backports instead, is that okay? Yes, I have now done that, having a properly backported set of patches would be great, thanks! greg k-h
