Re: [request for stable inclusion]perf: Enforce 1 as lower limit for perf_event_max_sample_rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 10:51 AM, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:13:24PM +0800, Weng Meiling wrote:
>>> Hi Luis and Ingo,
>>>
>>> 723478c8a471403c53cf144999701f6e0c4bbd11
>>> perf: Enforce 1 as lower limit for perf_event_max_sample_rate
>>>
>>> Please queue this for 3.11.x and 3.12.x. It fixes a divide-by-zero bug.
>>> The bug can be triggiered by writing 0 to /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate,
>>> which was introduced by 14c63f17b1fde5a575a28e96547a22b451c71fb5 ("perf: Drop sample
>>> rate when sampling is too slow").
>
>> Thank you Weng, I'll queue it for the 3.11 kernel.  I'm adding Greg to the
>> CC list, as he's the 3.12 maintainer.
>
> Not anymore -- I am :).

Er... when/where did that happen?  I have no objections at all, but I
do find it surprising.  Did I miss an announcement somewhere?

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]