pt., 6 mar 2020 o 14:23 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> The implementation if .irq_disable() which kicks in between
> the gpiolib and the driver is not properly mimicking the
> expected semantics of the irqchip core: the irqchip will
> call .irq_disable() if that exists, else it will call
> mask_irq() which first checks if .irq_mask() is defined
> before calling it.
>
> Since we are calling it unconditionally, we get this bug
> from drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c, as it only
> defines .irq_mask_ack and not .irq_mask:
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> pgd = (ptrval)
> (...)
> PC is at 0x0
> LR is at gpiochip_irq_disable+0x20/0x30
>
> Fix this by only calling .irq_mask() if it exists.
>
> Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 461c1a7d4733 ("gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index bdbc1649eafa..d0bb962f42d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2169,9 +2169,16 @@ static void gpiochip_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>
> + /*
> + * Since we override .irq_disable() we need to mimic the
> + * behaviour of __irq_disable() in irq/chip.c.
> + * First call .irq_disable() if it exists, else mimic the
> + * behaviour of mask_irq() which calls .irq_mask() if
> + * it exists.
> + */
> if (chip->irq.irq_disable)
> chip->irq.irq_disable(d);
> - else
> + else if (chip->irq.chip->irq_mask)
> chip->irq.chip->irq_mask(d);
> gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
> }
> --
> 2.24.1
>
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
