On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 3/10/20 3:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:02:37PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > > On 3/10/20 1:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.25 release. > > > > > > This fails to compile due to broken patch 001/168: > > > "block, bfq: get a ref to a group when adding it to a service tree": > > > > > > .. > > > block/bfq-wf2q.c: In function 'bfq_get_entity': > > > ./include/linux/kernel.h:994:51: error: 'struct bfq_group' has no member named 'entity' > > > .. > > > > > > The calls to bfq_get_entity::bfqg_and_blkg_get and bfq_forget_entity::bfqg_and_blkg_put > > > in bfq-wf2q.c need to be wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED, otherwise > > > the build will fail when CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is not enabled. > > > This horribly error-prone #ifdef mess was finally removed in upstream commit > > > 4d8340d0d4d9. For 5.4 we'll either need that as well or add them back. > > > > Ick, that's a mess. > > > > I'll go drop that patch now, odd that it passed my build tests... > > Uh, please no? It fixes a rather nasty UAF when cgroups are in use. > Please just add the other upstream commit as well, I confirmed it applies > cleanly and fixes the problem. I didn't get that from your email at all, sorry. So, what commits, and in what order, should be applied to 5.4.y at the moment to resolve this issue? thanks, greg k-h
