Patch "ARM: 7955/1: spinlock: ensure we have a compiler barrier before sev" has been added to the 3.13-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ARM: 7955/1: spinlock: ensure we have a compiler barrier before sev

to the 3.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm-7955-1-spinlock-ensure-we-have-a-compiler-barrier-before-sev.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 7c8746a9eb287642deaad0e7c2cdf482dce5e4be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:12:32 +0100
Subject: ARM: 7955/1: spinlock: ensure we have a compiler barrier before sev

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>

commit 7c8746a9eb287642deaad0e7c2cdf482dce5e4be upstream.

When unlocking a spinlock, we require the following, strictly ordered
sequence of events:

	<barrier>	/* dmb */
	<unlock>
	<barrier>	/* dsb */
	<sev>

Whilst the code does indeed reflect this in terms of the architecture,
the final <barrier> + <sev> have been contracted into a single inline
asm without a "memory" clobber, therefore the compiler is at liberty to
reorder the unlock to the end of the above sequence. In such a case,
a waiting CPU may be woken up before the lock has been unlocked, leading
to extremely poor performance.

This patch reworks the dsb_sev() function to make use of the dsb()
macro and ensure ordering against the unlock.

Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h |   15 +++------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -37,18 +37,9 @@
 
 static inline void dsb_sev(void)
 {
-#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7
-	__asm__ __volatile__ (
-		"dsb ishst\n"
-		SEV
-	);
-#else
-	__asm__ __volatile__ (
-		"mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4\n"
-		SEV
-		: : "r" (0)
-	);
-#endif
+
+	dsb(ishst);
+	__asm__(SEV);
 }
 
 /*


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from will.deacon@xxxxxxx are

queue-3.13/arm-7953-1-mm-ensure-tlb-invalidation-is-complete-before-enabling-mmu.patch
queue-3.13/arm-7955-1-spinlock-ensure-we-have-a-compiler-barrier-before-sev.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]