On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 12:00:07PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 11:23:14AM -0600, minyard@xxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Recent changes to alloc_pid() allow the pid number to be specified on > > the command line. If set_tid_size is set, then the code scanning the > > levels will hard-set retval to -EPERM, overriding it's previous -ENOMEM > > value. > > > > After the code scanning the levels, there are error returns that do not > > set retval, assuming it is still set to -ENOMEM. > > > > So set retval back to -ENOMEM after scanning the levels. > > > > Fixes: 49cb2fc42ce4 "fork: extend clone3() to support setting a PID" > > Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.5 > > Cc: Adrian Reber <areber@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! I've pulled the patch now and applied. > > I think that restores the old behavior. If you don't mind, I'll add a > comment on top of it saying something like: > "ENOMEM is not the most obvious choice but it's the what we've been > exposing to userspace for a long time and it's also documented > behavior. So we can't easily change it to something more sensible." That's great. I was just looking through the code for another reason and noticed the issue. Every little thing counts for quality. -corey > > Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>