On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:22:30PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > So why is this "Vulnerable"? Because it didn't think it could find my > > > > kernel image for some odd reason, despite it really being in /boot/ (I > > > > don't use netboot) > > > > Now I know the real reason why this test failed. > > With this note we can conclude this is not a regression. > > > > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386 for 4.19, 5.4 and 5.5 branches. > > Great, thanks for confirming and for testing all of these. We originally added spectre-meltdown-checker to lkft for informational purposes, so that we could compare its report to any actual tests that produce spectre/meltdown related failures (and help determine if the problem is hardware/firmware or kernel). In practice, it's never been helpful (because it's not an actual test) and so we'll be removing it from LKFT. Dan > > greg k-h -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
