On 04/03/20 09:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I'll be glad to just put KVM into the "never apply any patches to > stable unless you explicitly mark it as such", but the sad fact is that > many recent KVM fixes for reported CVEs never had any "Cc: stable@vger" > markings. Hmm, I did miss it in 433f4ba1904100da65a311033f17a9bf586b287e and acff78477b9b4f26ecdf65733a4ed77fe837e9dc, but that's going back to August 2018, so I can do better but it's not too shabby a record. :) > They only had "Fixes:" tags and so I have had to dig them out > of the tree and backport them myself in order to resolve those very > public issues. > > So can I ask that you always properly tag things for stable? If so, I > will be glad to ignore Fixes: tags for KVM patches in the future. > > I'll go drop this patch as well. Note, there are other KVM patches in > this release cycle also, can someone verify that I did not overreach for > them as well? I checked them and they are fine. Paolo
