On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:41:50AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit 3c23b83a88d00383e1d498cfa515249aa2fe0238 ] Please drop this patch from the stable queue, thanks. Lorenzo > The IORT specification [0] (Section 3, table 4, page 9) defines the > 'Number of IDs' as 'The number of IDs in the range minus one'. > > However, the IORT ID mapping function iort_id_map() treats the 'Number > of IDs' field as if it were the full IDs mapping count, with the > following check in place to detect out of boundary input IDs: > > InputID >= Input base + Number of IDs > > This check is flawed in that it considers the 'Number of IDs' field as > the full number of IDs mapping and disregards the 'minus one' from > the IDs count. > > The correct check in iort_id_map() should be implemented as: > > InputID > Input base + Number of IDs > > this implements the specification correctly but unfortunately it breaks > existing firmwares that erroneously set the 'Number of IDs' as the full > IDs mapping count rather than IDs mapping count minus one. > > e.g. > > PCI hostbridge mapping entry 1: > Input base: 0x1000 > ID Count: 0x100 > Output base: 0x1000 > Output reference: 0xC4 //ITS reference > > PCI hostbridge mapping entry 2: > Input base: 0x1100 > ID Count: 0x100 > Output base: 0x2000 > Output reference: 0xD4 //ITS reference > > Two mapping entries which the second entry's Input base = the first > entry's Input base + ID count, so for InputID 0x1100 and with the > correct InputID check in place in iort_id_map() the kernel would map > the InputID to ITS 0xC4 not 0xD4 as it would be expected. > > Therefore, to keep supporting existing flawed firmwares, introduce a > workaround that instructs the kernel to use the old InputID range check > logic in iort_id_map(), so that we can support both firmwares written > with the flawed 'Number of IDs' logic and the correct one as defined in > the specifications. > > [0]: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0049d/DEN0049D_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf > > Reported-by: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20191215203303.29811-1-pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx/ > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > index e11b5da6f828f..7d86468300b78 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > @@ -306,6 +306,59 @@ out: > return status; > } > > +struct iort_workaround_oem_info { > + char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1]; > + char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE + 1]; > + u32 oem_revision; > +}; > + > +static bool apply_id_count_workaround; > + > +static struct iort_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] __initdata = { > + { > + .oem_id = "HISI ", > + .oem_table_id = "HIP07 ", > + .oem_revision = 0, > + }, { > + .oem_id = "HISI ", > + .oem_table_id = "HIP08 ", > + .oem_revision = 0, > + } > +}; > + > +static void __init > +iort_check_id_count_workaround(struct acpi_table_header *tbl) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_info); i++) { > + if (!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_id, tbl->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE) && > + !memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_table_id, tbl->oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) && > + wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) { > + apply_id_count_workaround = true; > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "ID count for ID mapping entry is wrong, applying workaround\n"); > + break; > + } > + } > +} > + > +static inline u32 iort_get_map_max(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *map) > +{ > + u32 map_max = map->input_base + map->id_count; > + > + /* > + * The IORT specification revision D (Section 3, table 4, page 9) says > + * Number of IDs = The number of IDs in the range minus one, but the > + * IORT code ignored the "minus one", and some firmware did that too, > + * so apply a workaround here to keep compatible with both the spec > + * compliant and non-spec compliant firmwares. > + */ > + if (apply_id_count_workaround) > + map_max--; > + > + return map_max; > +} > + > static int iort_id_map(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *map, u8 type, u32 rid_in, > u32 *rid_out) > { > @@ -322,8 +375,7 @@ static int iort_id_map(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *map, u8 type, u32 rid_in, > return -ENXIO; > } > > - if (rid_in < map->input_base || > - (rid_in >= map->input_base + map->id_count)) > + if (rid_in < map->input_base || rid_in > iort_get_map_max(map)) > return -ENXIO; > > *rid_out = map->output_base + (rid_in - map->input_base); > @@ -1542,5 +1594,6 @@ void __init acpi_iort_init(void) > return; > } > > + iort_check_id_count_workaround(iort_table); > iort_init_platform_devices(); > } > -- > 2.20.1 > > >
