From: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx> commit c3afa804c58e5c30ac63858b527fffadc88bce82 upstream. Care is taken with "index", however with the current version the actual xgpio_writereg is using index for data but xgpio_regoffset(chip, i) for the offset. And since i is already incremented it is incorrect. This patch fixes it so that index is used for the offset too. Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200125221410.8022-1-pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c @@ -147,9 +147,10 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gp for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) { if (*mask == 0) break; + /* Once finished with an index write it out to the register */ if (index != xgpio_index(chip, i)) { xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET + - xgpio_regoffset(chip, i), + index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags); index = xgpio_index(chip, i); @@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gp } xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET + - xgpio_regoffset(chip, i), chip->gpio_state[index]); + index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags); }
