This fixes possible lost wakeup introduced by the a218cc491420.
Originally modifications to ep->wq were serialized by ep->wq.lock,
but in the a218cc491420 new rw lock was introduced in order to
relax fd event path, i.e. callers of ep_poll_callback() function.
After the change ep_modify and ep_insert (both are called on
epoll_ctl() path) were switched to ep->lock, but ep_poll
(epoll_wait) was using ep->wq.lock on wqueue list modification.
The bug doesn't lead to any wqueue list corruptions, because wake up
path and list modifications were serialized by ep->wq.lock
internally, but actual waitqueue_active() check prior wake_up()
call can be reordered with modifications of ep ready list, thus
wake up can be lost.
And yes, can be healed by explicit smp_mb():
list_add_tail(&epi->rdlink, &ep->rdllist);
smp_mb();
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq))
wake_up(&ep->wp);
But let's make it simple, thus current patch replaces ep->wq.lock
with the ep->lock for wqueue modifications, thus wake up path
always observes activeness of the wqueue correcty.
Fixes: a218cc491420 ("epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention")
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205933
Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christopher Kohlhoff <chris.kohlhoff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #5.1+
---
Nothing was changed in v3
Nothing interesting in v2:
changed the comment a bit and specified Reported-by and Bisected-by tags
fs/eventpoll.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index b041b66002db..eee3c92a9ebf 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -1854,9 +1854,9 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
waiter = true;
init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
- spin_lock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
+ write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
__add_wait_queue_exclusive(&ep->wq, &wait);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
+ write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
}
for (;;) {
@@ -1904,9 +1904,9 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
goto fetch_events;
if (waiter) {
- spin_lock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
+ write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
__remove_wait_queue(&ep->wq, &wait);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
+ write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
}
return res;
--
2.24.1
