This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
to the 3.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
edac-correct-workqueue-setup-path.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:15:00 +0100
Subject: EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
commit cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 upstream.
We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when
we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period
(edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec.
On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been
initialized already.
Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391457913-881-1-git-send-email-prarit@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struc
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
*/
-static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
+static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec,
+ bool init)
{
edac_dbg(0, "\n");
@@ -567,7 +568,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct m
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+ if (init)
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+
mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
}
@@ -611,7 +614,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value);
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
@@ -782,7 +785,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *
/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true);
} else {
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp@xxxxxxx are
queue-3.12/edac-poll-timeout-cannot-be-zero-p2.patch
queue-3.12/edac-correct-workqueue-setup-path.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html