Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: free block groups after free'ing fs trees" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:30:41PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 4e19443da1941050b346f8fc4c368aa68413bc88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:17:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: free block groups after free'ing fs trees

Sometimes when running generic/475 we would trip the
WARN_ON(cache->reserved) check when free'ing the block groups on umount.
This is because sometimes we don't commit the transaction because of IO
errors and thus do not cleanup the tree logs until at umount time.

These blocks are still reserved until they are cleaned up, but they
aren't cleaned up until _after_ we do the free block groups work.  Fix
this by moving the free after free'ing the fs roots, that way all of the
tree logs are cleaned up and we have a properly cleaned fs.  A bunch of
loops of generic/475 confirmed this fixes the problem.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>

I took 4273eaff9b8d ("btrfs: use bool argument in free_root_pointers()")
too and queued both for 5.4-4.9.

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux