Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 02:26:40PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 02:04:21PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 09. 02. 20, 12:33, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:31:05 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space

5.5.2 was already released with this patch:
commit 165387a9c90152f35976d82feca6eff5f0d5ac02
Author: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jan 31 09:31:05 2020 -0500

    btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space

    commit d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 upstream.

It cannot be applied twice :).

Oops, Sasha beat me too it, sorry for the noise :)

I've grabbed it for the fixes: tag, sorry :)

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux