Hello! On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 07:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:15:44PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 22:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.2 release. > > > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:17:59 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.5.2-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.5.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know. > > It would be interesting to figure out how all of the different build > errors on this "round" of releases did not trip up your systems... We're not building these configs: allyesconfig allmodconfig omap2plus_defconfig imx_v6_v7_defconfig nor building for ARCH=riscv, which were the ones failing. Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx
