Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/26] 3.10.31-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/20/2014 06:39 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 02/20/2014 12:30 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
On 2014/2/20 8:29, Shuah Khan wrote:

On 02/18/2014 03:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.31 release.
There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu Feb 20 22:45:20 UTC 2014.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.31-rc1.gz
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h


Compile and boot tests passed on AMD system. Boot failed on Intel
systems. I think the following changes are the suspect, so far by
process of elimination - these two aren't in 3.12 and 3.13

#    modified:   mm/hugetlb.c
#    modified:   mm/memory-failure.c

However, my strong suspect is the following:

Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@xxxxxxxxxx>
     mm: fix process accidentally killed by mce because of huge page
migration

I don't see how this could cause problems, none the less, I will test
without these changes and let you know.


Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     mm/memory-failure.c: fix memory leak in successful soft offlining

I will test without these changes and let you know.

-- Shuah


Hi Shuah

I tested on my system, it boot successfully.

hardware: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2420 0 @ 1.90GHz
OS: v3.10.30 + the two patches

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

Xishi,

I tested without your patch and still see the issue. My wild guess
wasn't a good one :) I am starting git bisect now.

-- Shuah



ok I have it isolated to the following patch:

Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
    intel_pstate: Take core C0 time into account for core busy calculation

From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>

commit fcb6a15c2e7e76d493e6f91ea889ab40e1c643a4 upstream.

Take non-idle time into account when calculating core busy time.
This ensures that intel_pstate will notice a decrease in load.

Boots just fine without this change.

-- Shuah

--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]