On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:07:52PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> There are many places where ops->disable is called directly. Instead we
> should use _regulator_do_disable() which also handles gpio regulators.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.10+
> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 017f5cb..a0c916f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
...
> @@ -3641,12 +3637,10 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void)
> } else {
> if (!have_full_constraints())
> goto unlock;
> - if (!ops->disable)
> - goto unlock;
> if (!_regulator_is_enabled(rdev))
> goto unlock;
>
> - error = ops->disable(rdev);
> + error = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
ops is unused and creates a compile warning. I will resend later with
the 'ops' variable removed from the function.
Regards,
Markus
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature