On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:18 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:58:32PM +0000, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > > Please see the bisection report below about a boot failure, it > > looks legit as this commit was made today: > > > > Fix it by ignoring the config in the device tree for now: the > > > later patches in the series will push all inversion handling > > > over to the gpiolib core and set it up properly in the > > > boardfiles for legacy devices, but I did not finish that > > > for this kernel cycle. So here the patch clearly says it is for "this kernel cycle" which I feel implies that it is NOT for any previous kernels stable or not... I'm sorry if I missed the "look at this thing that we will apply to stable soon" mail, sadly there are just too many of these for me to handle sometimes. (Maybe it means I am making too many mistakes to begin with, mea culpa.) > > > Reported-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx> > > > Reported-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Oh dear, this is another bot backported commit which I suspect is > lacking some context or other from all the other work that was done with > GPIO enables :( This AI seems a bit confused :/ Maybe it is the prolific use of the word "fix" that triggers it? Yours, Linus Walleij
