From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> commit d935bd50dd14a7714cbdba9a76435dbb56edb1ae upstream. When a GPIO offset in a lookup table is out-of-range, the printed error message (1) does not include the actual out-of-range value, and (2) contains an off-by-one error in the upper bound. Avoid user confusion by also printing the actual GPIO offset, and correcting the upper bound of the range. While at it, use "%u" for unsigned int. Sample impact: -requested GPIO 0 is out of range [0..32] for chip e6052000.gpio +requested GPIO 0 (45) is out of range [0..31] for chip e6052000.gpio Fixes: 2a3cf6a3599e9015 ("gpiolib: return -ENOENT if no GPIO mapping exists") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191127095919.4214-1-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -3049,8 +3049,9 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(stru if (chip->ngpio <= p->chip_hwnum) { dev_err(dev, - "requested GPIO %d is out of range [0..%d] for chip %s\n", - idx, chip->ngpio, chip->label); + "requested GPIO %u (%u) is out of range [0..%u] for chip %s\n", + idx, p->chip_hwnum, chip->ngpio - 1, + chip->label); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); }