Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/11/2014 12:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny
and ready to go.  Not so with these releases.  Maybe it's the horrid
weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or
something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world
screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking
the build every other patch.  Some developers decided to get into the
act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable
patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous
times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and
take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie...

Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't
trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and
run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater.

You have been warned.

-----------------


Worked fine on all my test systems. Compile tests and boot tests passed. No dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.

-- Shuah


--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]