RE: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Fix kernel crash when spinning on RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Waiman Long
> Sent: 15 January 2020 14:27
...
> >>  		if ((wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF) &&
> >> -		    (rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, 0) == OWNER_NULL))
> >> +		    rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE) == OWNER_NULL)
> > Nit: the inner braces in the first half of the conditional aren't required
> > either.
> 
> I typically over-parenthesize the code to make it easier to read as we
> don't need to think too much about operator precedence to see if it is
> doing the right thing.

The problem is it actually makes it harder to read.
It is difficult for the 'mark 1 eyeball' to follow lots of sets of brackets.
Since == (etc) are the lowest priority operators (apart from ?:) they
never need ().

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux