On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:34:59AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > On 2020-01-16, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2020-01-15, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:01:50AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, there were two patches I sent a while ago[1]. I can re-send them if > > > > you like. The second patch switches open_how->mode to a u64, but I'm > > > > still on the fence about whether that makes sense to do... > > > > > > IMO plain __u64 is better than games with __aligned_u64 - all sizes are > > > fixed, so... > > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191219105533.12508-1-cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Do you want that series folded into "open: introduce openat2(2) syscall" > > > and "selftests: add openat2(2) selftests" or would you rather have them > > > appended at the end of the series. Personally I'd go for "fold them in" > > > if it had been about my code, but it's really up to you. > > > > "fold them in" would probably be better to avoid making the mainline > > history confusing afterwards. Thanks. > > Also (if you prefer) I can send a v3 which uses u64s rather than > aligned_u64s. <mode "lazy bastard"> Could you fold and resend the results of folding (i.e. replacements for two commits in question)? </mode> The hard part is, of course, in updating commit messages ;-)
