From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit b3c6a59975415bde29cfd76ff1ab008edbf614a9 ]
Avoid that running test nvme/012 from the blktests suite triggers the
following false positive lockdep complaint:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.0.0-rc3-xfstests-00015-g1236f7d60242 #841 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
ksoftirqd/1/16 is trying to acquire lock:
000000000282032e (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
but task is already holding lock:
00000000cbadcbc2 (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock);
lock(&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/16:
#0: 00000000cbadcbc2 (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-xfstests-00015-g1236f7d60242 #841
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x90
__lock_acquire.cold.45+0x2b4/0x313
lock_acquire+0x98/0x160
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
blk_mq_complete_request+0x76/0x110
nvmet_req_complete+0x15/0x110 [nvmet]
nvmet_bio_done+0x27/0x50 [nvmet]
blk_update_request+0xd7/0x2d0
blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x100
blk_flush_complete_seq+0xe5/0x350
flush_end_io+0x12f/0x1d0
blk_done_softirq+0x9f/0xd0
__do_softirq+0xca/0x440
run_ksoftirqd+0x24/0x50
smpboot_thread_fn+0x113/0x1e0
kthread+0x121/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-flush.c | 5 +++++
block/blk.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 1eec9cbe5a0a..b1f0a1ac505c 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include "blk.h"
#include "blk-mq.h"
@@ -492,6 +493,9 @@ struct blk_flush_queue *blk_alloc_flush_queue(struct request_queue *q,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fq->flush_queue[1]);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fq->flush_data_in_flight);
+ lockdep_register_key(&fq->key);
+ lockdep_set_class(&fq->mq_flush_lock, &fq->key);
+
return fq;
fail_rq:
@@ -506,6 +510,7 @@ void blk_free_flush_queue(struct blk_flush_queue *fq)
if (!fq)
return;
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&fq->key);
kfree(fq->flush_rq);
kfree(fq);
}
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index 47fba9362e60..ffea1691470e 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct blk_flush_queue {
* at the same time
*/
struct request *orig_rq;
+ struct lock_class_key key;
spinlock_t mq_flush_lock;
};
--
2.20.1
