From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 7a1592bcb15d71400a98632727791d1e68ea0ee8 ]
When do tunnel PMTU update and calls __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() in the end,
we should not call dst_confirm_neigh() as there is no two-way communication.
v5: No Change.
v4: Update commit description
v3: Do not remove dst_confirm_neigh, but add a new bool parameter in
dst_ops.update_pmtu to control whether we should do neighbor confirm.
Also split the big patch to small ones for each area.
v2: Remove dst_confirm_neigh in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu.
Fixes: 0dec879f636f ("net: use dst_confirm_neigh for UDP, RAW, ICMP, L2TP")
Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int tnl_update_pmtu(struct net_de
mtu = skb_valid_dst(skb) ? dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)) : dev->mtu;
if (skb_valid_dst(skb))
- skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu);
+ skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu);
if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
if (!skb_is_gso(skb) &&
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ ip4ip6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct i
if (rel_info > dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb2)))
goto out;
- skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb2, rel_info);
+ skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb2, rel_info);
}
icmp_send(skb2, rel_type, rel_code, htonl(rel_info));
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ route_lookup:
mtu = max(mtu, skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) ?
IPV6_MIN_MTU : IPV4_MIN_MTU);
- skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu);
+ skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu);
if (skb->len - t->tun_hlen - eth_hlen > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) {
*pmtu = mtu;
err = -EMSGSIZE;
